L.O.P.S.T.E.R.
Laboratory of Plastic Surgery
& Tissue Engineering Research
Leuven, Belgium
Jan Vranckx
PLASTIC Reconstructive Surgery focuses on the
reconstruction of tissue defects caused by trauma,
burns, congenital deformity, vascular failure or as the
result of tumor excision. Based on specific features of the
defect, the most appropriate strategy is selected in order to
reconstruct tissues as authentic as possible. State-of-the art
reconstructive strategies should optimally restore function
and aesthetics (e.g., for deep burns in the face) and simultaneously
aim for minimal donor site morbidity.
In this context cell-and tissue engineering and regenerative
medicine were heralded as promising strategies for
tissue repair two decades ago but so far only few clinical
therapeutic options evolved and no autogenic engineered
tissues could be developed. Reason is the complex molecular
biology of cells and genes that should be matched with
the macroscopic clinical requirements for tissue repair such
as neovascularization and tissue rejection of non-autogenic
tissues. We need to understand key features of the regular
wound repair processes and take that knowledge to threedimensional
tissue repair.
Figure 1:
(left) hands detail;
(right) Leuven Town Hall
The response of tissues to injury forms the foundation
of all reconstructive procedures. The intricate wound healing
and tissue repair process involves the complex interplay
of numeral cells, proteins and humeral factors. Growth
factors are secreted by all cells orchestrating the several
phases of wound repair. These proteins seem to play the
role of directors of healing, messengers to signal other
cells and inducers of cellular migration and proliferation.
Topical administration of recombinant growth factors as
proteins have major shortcomings such as short shelf life,
low bioavailibility, enzymatic inactivaton by proteinases
in the wound and inefficient delivery to target cells.Gene
therapy differs from recombinant therapy in its delivery
of the template for the protein rather than the protein
itself. These genes are integrated into cells, turning the
cells into ‘mini-factories’ of the growth factor. The major
challenges facing wound repair then consist in identifying
an appropriate gene that is effective in wound healing and
then make that gene expressed by cells in the wound at
clinical beneficial levels.
Figure 2:
(Top) BOECs acLDL positive Endothelial Progenitor Cells.
(Centre) LacZ positive basal cell keratinocytes.
(Bottom) Newly formed bloodvessels stained for ECs, MT1-MMP, FBs and fibronectin.
Wound repair and angiogenesis
Guided by the lack of appropriate autologous strategies
in many clinical tissue reconstructions, our aim is to generate
custom-made vascularised three-dimensional tissue
constructs built up by autologous donor cells. We focus on
ex vivo gene transfer using primarily autologous cultured
cells. The advantage of ex-vivo strategies is the synergistic
impact of the cultivated cell substrate and the expressed
growth factors on the wound microenvironment. Ex vivo
gene transfer techniques may form the backbone in the
development of ‘smart’ biomaterials by supplying the bioinformation
content that may induce cell migration and
proliferation, angiogenesis and tissue integration.
With the cooperation of Dr Eriksson’s laboratory in
Boston, we integrated the standardized wet wound healing
model and the novel flexible transparent wound chambers
that function as mini-incubators. We established protocols
to cultivate cell suspension cultures of the progenitor
fraction of p63+ basal cell keratinocytes, fibroblasts and
endothelial progenitor cells (identified by a set of primers).
All these cell cultures are grown in serum-limited
conditions.
Proteinomic studies using protein chips, allowed us to
analyze growth factor profiles from clinical and research
wound fluids. In all our actual research protocols, we
quantify concentrations of VEGF, EGF, bFGF, TGF-ß1,
IGF-1,HGF, MMP1, MMP9, TIMP1,TIMP2 and MT1-
MMP. All these proteins play an essential role in our
aim to generate a three-dimensional vascularized tissue
construct.
3-D vascularized tissue engineering
Angiogenesis is induced by VEGF 165-expressing cell
cultures and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).After
having identified human and porcine EPCs by PCR with
multiple primers, immunohistochemistry, and LDL uptake
assays, we actually perform in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis
models to analyze the development of endothelial
networks in various 3-D substrates. We introduced these
well defined EPCs into our standardized full thickness
porcine wound model.
We cultivated an autogenic matrix laminated with
fibroblast sheets and covered with VEGF-expressing
basal cell keratinocytes. We now analyze cell behavior
and lamination properties. In our ‘Millefeuille approach’
(TERMIS 2007), we use these confluent fibroblast sheets
as template, covered with keratinocyte layers and filled
with EPCs to trigger angiogenesis: 3-D vasculaires tissue
layers as a scaffold for tissue engineering.
Lipoaspirate-derived mesenchymal stem cell fractions
are produced (fatty tissues are harvested easily by a plastic
surgeon) to cultivate chondrocytes and adipocytes using
appropriate culture conditions. The adipocytes are cultured
to obtain adipose tissue layers which are elementary to define
the subcutis in full thickness skin; for a reconstructive
surgeon these adipose layers could also serve as substrate
for breast reconstruction or scar treatment. The chondrocytes
serve in tissue engineering protocols to generate a
cartilage framework that may be used for nose and ear
reconstructions.
For such 3-dimensional constructs we need a 3-dimensional
shaped biomatrix as a template. We actually work
with rapid prototyping technologies that translate our clinical
CT data into three-dimensional bioplotted templates.
These custom-made porous templates are further treated
with ex vivo gene transfer protocols, using autogenic cells
that gradually invade the template while secreting pro-angiogenic
growth factors which induce and coordinate
matrix deposition and angiogenesis.
Since the appropriate cocktail of cells and growth factors
may strongly induce angiogenesis and tissue growth,
we must be able to regulate timing and gene overexpression
levels to avoid progression of healing towards hypertrophy,
sclerosis or even cancerogenesis. We integrated a tetracycline-
inducible gene switch into our VEGF expressing
plasmids.
When tetracycline was added into the FTW through
the wound chamber, expression of VEGF started. Cell
suspension cultures of VEGF-overexpressing BCKs under
regulation of a TC-inducible gene switch enhanced
fibronectin deposition, endothelial cell tubuli formation
and accelerated reepithelialization of FTW. The effects
may be explained by the complex crosstalk between KCs,
FBs, the ECM, VEGF and ECs.
Figure 3:
In vitro and in vivo VEGF165 expression measured by ELISA.
3 (A) In vitro, transfected KC, without addition of TC, show a basal VEGF165 expression, similar to the non-transfected control group. 1µg/ml TC shows a 25 fold up regulation after 48h compared to the control group, whereas other concentrations show a lower VEGF165 expression.
3 (B) In vivo, the saline control and transfected KC groups, without TC activation (VEGF+0µg/ml TC), show similarly increased VEGF165 expression. Addition of 1µg/ml TC (VEGF+1µg/ml TC) results in an upregulation of VEGF165 expression.
The actual multidisciplinary approach brings together
the molecular biology of cells and genes, the material sciences
of resorbable matrices and scaffolds and the clinical
expertise of tissues and wound repair and might well lead
to the cultivation and production of a veritable authentic
and autologous full thickness tissue equivalents, improving
functional and esthetic outcome, social reintegration, pain
relief and quality of life.
- Jan Jeroen Vranckx MD, PhD, FCCP
-
Dept Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Centre
PI. Laboratory of Plastic Surgery & Tissue Engineering Research,
KUL Leuven University Hospitals, Herestraat 49
Leuven, Belgium
jan.vranckx@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
32 16 348722