ETRS Logo

EUROPEAN  TISSUE  REPAIR  SOCIETY

CONCEPTS IN CLINICAL WOUND HEALING

PROJECT IST 1999–20226 DERMA
Prototypal system – based on image acquisition, 3D and chromatic reconstruction –
for the objective monitoring of skin lesions

Consortium Composition

  1. ENEA – Ente per le Nuove tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente, UDA Agenzia per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile
  2. CGS – Sas di Coluccia Michele & C. Sas – Sett. Ricerca Scientifica Avanzata
  3. SIDI – Sistemi Digitali Srl
  4. DEPI – Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa
  5. DECO – Copenhagen Wound Healing Center
  6. DEOX – Oxford Wound Healing Institute
  7. DEDE – Unit of Health Economics and Technology Assessment in Health Care, Center for Public Affairs Studies, Hungary

Contact information

Dr Marco Romanelli
Department of Dermatology
University of Pisa
Via Roma, 67
56126 Pisa, Italy
Tel: +39 050 992436
Fax: +39 050 551124
E-mail: m.romanelli@med.unipi.it

Introduction

Over the past few years, a number of highly developed objective and non-invasive techniques for wound assessment have been brought into use. These techniques are important research tools in investigating the different phases of wound healing and in determining therapeutic effects. Since non-invasive measurements can be performed repeatedly on the same wound site, changes during wound healing may be monitored. Our knowledge about the physical properties of acute and chronic wounds is likely to increase in the near future, thanks to this greater interaction with the engineering field. Because of its importance in wound healing, the use of non invasive measurements can be expected to progress with new techniques and methods to be applied in research and in clinical practice.

The DERMA system enables users to accurately acquire three-dimensional digital models of various types of skin wounds and also to collect (together with geometrical data) colour information. The main goal is to monitor wound evolution, through the use of a series of numerical acquisitions and objective measurements. The system therefore does not simply manage digital acquisition, but is equipped with various measuring/analysis tools and is able to compare scanning.

The DERMA system is equipped with a MINOLTA Vivid 900 laser scanner, which is used for digitalizing (or scanning) wound shape and colour. All scanner interface and control functions have been developed within the DERMA system, in order to have user-friendly equipment (hardware and software). This has led to a more complex system implementation, but has facilitated use, since the management of an extremely complex tool, such as a 3D scanner, has been solidly integrated within the system interface. Since the final users will be doctors and not computer experts, a user-friendly system is believed to be a fundamental parameter for its success. Having a single software tool that intuitively runs both scanner control functions and acquisition management/elaboration functions is highly important.

1. DERMA Features

1.1 Volume calculation

The perimeter, area and volume of a wound may be measured on the current scan through a direct manipulation interface. For this reason, suitable calculation procedures have been defined (which calculate linear measurements, surfaces and volumes directly on the digital 3D model), as well as interactive routines that enable the user to specify or delineate the areas where measurements must be taken.

The part of the interface that visualizes the acquired surface enables the user to define the wound edge with a semi-automatic procedure: the operator makes an approximate drawing of the wound perimeter and this initial detail is refined by the DERMA system through automatic algorithms, which try to make the perimeter defined by the operator more faithful to the digitized image profile.

The initial wound perimeter definition is iteratively controlled by the interface: the interface allows the user to draw a broken line around the edge by selecting the single points through which the line must pass; by selecting again the first point given, the edge (polyline) is closed. It is then possible to manually refine the result achieved by moving the points or by adding further ones. The first, approximate edge is then refined through automatic algorithms capable of individuating the wound edge area, and adding new points to the polyline and/or moving existing ones.
Once the wound perimeter has been digitally defined, it is possible to calculate the internal wound surface by using the acquired 3D data. Since this measurement is carried out on the real wound surface, it also takes into consideration all creases, protrusions and small fractures inside the wound itself. For this reason, the measurement may change from one scan to another although the external wound perimeter remains exactly the same. This type of information therefore may be considered as a new, numerically accurate parameter to be assessed during the life of a wound.

With regard to the calculation of the ‘external’ surface and volume of a wound, it is necessary to assess its original shape in order to create the missing volume virtually. Since information on the shape of the skin before the beginning of the pathology is missing, the virtual reconstruction of the original wound surface must be as user-friendly and easy to carry out as possible. The system, based on the shape of the surface immediately outside the perimeter, proposes an interpolating surface that is continuously connected to the surface outside the wound and to that covering it. The physician, through the use of simple, mouse-guided interactive tools, can control the main parameters that guide the construction of the interpolating surface by moving it, for example, further away from or nearer to the center (or other points) of the wound.

1.2 Colour segmentation of lesion area

  • the user selects a point (seed) inside the previously defined wound edge and corresponding to the colour to classify within the 3D model. Automatically, a region-growing algorithm with absolute colour classification criteria delimits the corresponding area. The operator may use an automatic extension function that searches for other seeds that are compatible with the average colour of the first region by iteratively applying the region-growing algorithm; alternatively, he/she may manually select another seed in an area thought to have similar colour features (also in this case, the region-growing algorithm is applied);
  • the user may control the ‘tolerance’ of the region-growing algorithm step by step (the final step must include the overall wound);
  • the user may repeat the procedure described above for 5 classifications at most. The next application of the region-growing algorithm avoids the possible overlapping of areas associated to different colours by positioning the edge on the point that is chromatically equidistant between two ‘competing’ seeds. The user may freely assign a name to each classification obtained – the environment automatically calculates perimeter, area and percentage with respect to the wound surface of each classification;
  • the classification results are visualized with ‘false colours’ (corresponding to the average colour of the classified region) on the 3D wound model (the area outside the edge of the region simultaneously assumes a neutral colour).


Italian DERMA team visits Oxford for patient evaluation.


Above: DERMA equipment in the Oxford Clinic.


Above: Dr Antonio Magliaro, Dr Francesco Rizzello, Dr George Cherry
and Dr Georgio Meini outside the Oxford Wound Healing Clinic.

2. User Interface

The graphic interface of the programme has two windows: the largest, on the right, is used for 2D/3D visualization; the smallest, on the left, is a dialogue window for managing the greater part of all expected operations.

Programme interaction has a linear structure: the user is guided through clear ‘operative’ phases, each associated to a clear logical action (e.g., scan, measurement, data analysis). This division helps systematically group the various operations within the programme.

By following this setup, the left part of the interface is divided into different ‘tabs’, each corresponding to a working data or mode interaction phase.

2.1 Patient selection

The user may consult the list of patients grouped in the database, add or delete names and correct data already entered. In order to proceed towards the next step, the user must select a patient he/she wishes to work on, who will become the ‘current patient’.

2.2 Scanning

After selecting the patient, the user has access to all the previous scanning. During this phase, the user controls the scanner and may proceed with a new scan by using the control tools made available by the graphic interface. The scan may be rejected or, if important, inserted among the list of the patient’s scans.

During this phase it is possible to recall from the scanning list the ‘current scan’, upon which the user may operate during the course of subsequent working modes.

An immediate measurement function permits the user to measure distances quickly and easily (just by clicking on two points); this function is useful for immediately controlling the acquired area and for extemporaneous measurements on library scans.

2.3 Analysis

A study of the colorimetric data acquired by the scanner may be carried out on the current scan: the analysis permits the user to semi-automatically individuate areas within the wound surface with different skin features and to carry out measurements. The process is conducted by using automatic segmentation algorithms that, starting from the image, individuate homogenous areas with colours similar to a number of basic shades chosen by the user. Once the areas have been individuated, the real 3D surface extension may be measured, thanks to the biunique correspondence between each pixel of the image acquired by the scanner and the 3D surface.

2.4 Comparisons

The operator may compare different scans (and the data associated to them) carried out on a current patient thanks to the simultaneous visualization of a number of scans (usually carried out at different times). The interface enables the user to select two or four scans, which are visualized side by side so that the wound’s evolution may be monitored over time. For greater clarity, the associated measurements previously acquired by the operator may be visualized on the selected 3D models.

It should be pointed out that it is not always possible to go from one phase to another (for example, it is not possible to carry out a measurement without selecting the ‘current’ scan); the following diagram indicates the possible passages between the various system modes.

3. Database Interface

In order to facilitate system use, the database interface is completely hidden to the final user.
When the programme is started, connections to the scanner and to the database are made and from this point onwards the whole system is managed by specific control and interface modules.

4. 3D Scanner Interface

The scanner is easily controlled, so that it may be used by non-specialized personnel. In most cases the scanner can find the right parameters on its own, leaving the operator to simply individuate the points.

If necessary, it is possible to control the scanning laser intensity and focusing distance by hand.

On the right part of the interface the following are displayed:

  • black and white scanning image (monitor mode), which enables users to orientate the scanner and frame the area to be acquired;
  • 3D surfaces acquired during scanning;
  • colour 2D image acquired during scanning and needed for dividing the lesion into its various component parts.

5. 3D Graphics

3D data visualization is carried out using Open GL libraries (hardware accelerated by most video cards). This guarantees good drawing speed for large-sized 3D models, such as those obtained with high resolution 3D scanning.

The surfaces acquired are visualized as triangular and illuminated mesh; visualization may be with or without texture mapping and colour rendering: the former is useful for analyzing geometrical features, which are weakened by the colour on the mesh. A simple mouse-run trackball enables the user to rotate, move and reduce the 3D model allowing an accurate inspection of the area.




< Return to Bulletin 11.1 & Contents


© European Tissue Repair Society
Contact Us

Designed by the eDoodle group